Sunday, 28 March 2010

Pure Cinema




Sometimes you want to watch a film to laugh, other times to be exhilarated by an action packed thrill ride. Still other times you just want to wile away an hour and a half by being whisked away to a gorgeous, far off land you'll never be financially capable to visit in person. Once in a while, you want to watch a heart wrenching true story or emotionally volatile tearjerker to reacquaint yourself with your... what are they called again? You know, those things you never use, but are led to believe by consensus reality are fundamentally integral to our species? Oh yeah, feelings. Every now and again, the intellectually starved part of us requires a challenging art film to force us to be pompous and endeavor to figure out what some spacey auteur may or may not have meant by the hour and a half of drivel we've just subjected ourselves to. Then there's those instances of pure nostalgic indulgence that, not unlike comfort food and reassuring articles of clothing, can satisfy and placate when seemingly nothing else will do.

I can pick apart pretty much any film watching exercise and relegate it to the correct categorical gratification shelf. I intimately understand the motivating factor for film selection and can scientifically ascertain the motivations of the most discerning cineaste. That having been said, I want to discuss a category I drunkenly stumbled upon late last night during a revelatory, bluray screening of Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller's Sin City. Pure Cinema. I don't give a blue fuck how poncy and self serving that sounds. I am a man, who after much soul searching, mental pathway opening and personal experience, has come to the conclusion that film is the total sum of humankind's artistic expression that it is self aware and wants to leave a record of how beautiful and terrifying that realization is. All the art forms we have created since the dawn of time finding a perfect synthesis within the framework of a singular technological achievement. Architecture, music, writing, fashion, hair, makeup, photography and the most human of all art forms, acting. Film is what makes God's of mere mortals. We suddenly are able to alter perspective and shape reality. With film we can write our own history and invent any future we want, so forgive me if I attach mythic import to the medium.

Anyway, back to Sin City and the potency of pure cinema. For those of you not in the know (and there's no way I believe anyone reading this isn't), Sin City is an adaptation of a Frank Miller graphic novel. The art is striking and the writing is your basic juvenile male wish fulfillment, but goddamn if it isn't outrageously entertaining pulp nonsense! The film adaptation however, is nothing short of sublime perfection. The stories need no subtext or social relevance, they need only serve as a framing device for the visuals, the sounds, the splashes of color, the larger than life performances. Bruce Willis is a one dimensional actor with roughly two faces in his arsenal, but his granite carved face underlined by that glowing, shock white tie flapping in the Basin City breeze makes the histrionic exhortations of say, Daniel Day Lewis seem like buffonish exertions. Sir Lawrence Olivier in Spartacus comes across about as nuanced as William Zabka in Just one of the Guys when stacked up against washed up 80's hearthrob Mickey Rourke in Sin City standout segment The Hard Goodbye. The point is, in the face of a penultimate pairing of source material and execution, pretentious, overstuffed Oscar bait looks like the hollow garbage it truly is.

Of course a film like Sin City will never win Best Picture, but what movie do you think will be fondly remembered and lovingly revisited in the following decades, Miller and Rodriguez's paean to uncompromising tough guys and hard luck dames, or Paul Haggis' flaccid, obvious doorstop of a moral talking to, Crash?

I could, off the top of my head and entirely unprompted, give you a million moments from that masterpiece that make anything hanging in the Louvre look like a homeless person's turd sculpture. Marv walking in the poring rain, Hartigan seated in his improbably dimensioned jail cell, the incomprable Powers Boothe as Senator Roark at the end of that hospital bed, Benicio DelToro as "Iron" Jack Rafferty saddled with that comical fake nose delivering his lines with more maniacal menace than Satan himself could muster. The shadow's, the light, the blood, the jarring splashes of color, the beautiful women, the reflections in black eyes.

It is a film that need not explain itself. It just is. You could have a thousand viewings under your belt, come across it on cable, and after scant seconds watching it, need to pull it off the shelf and start it all over from the beginning. It will always pull you in, it will ceaselessly thrill you, amaze you, devastate you. It is, as a man wiser than myself once put it, "gorgeousness and gorgeousity made flesh". It is Pure Cinema. The holy grail, why we worship film, why we exalt cinema. You don't question it and you don't dare resist it. You revel in it and attempt to get like minded individuals to revisit it and see what you see in it. What the hell do you think I've been doing for the last 6 paragraph's? Seriously, watch it on bluray. Peace.

Friday, 12 March 2010

In defense of the noob

Goddamn Friday the 13th part 3 is an awful film. Just straight up amateur garbage. There's maybe 2 good kills and a moderately amusing climax and that's it. Seriously, I defy you to watch it with the gauzy veil of nostalgia stripped away and tell me it is a good movie. Good? Shit's not even competently constructed from a technical standpoint. There is zero effort put into this damn thing. I love how today's hipper than thou genre fan sits back sucking on a big 80's pacifier clutching a slasher franchise security blanket and bemoans the onslaught of remakes and soulless studio films. You want to see soulless? Watch Friday the 13th part 3.

Watch the scene when the biker chick Fox wanders around in the barn for roughly 46 minutes, padding the run time in much the same fashion as the donut eating, shit taking, rabbit handling retard did in the first interminable sequence. She walks through the lower level for what seems like an eternity, inexplicably grinning at objects like an idiot until she comes across a canteen and does something so bizarre, so pointless, so downright baffling it belongs in the scene blocking hall of shame. She picks it up, looks at it with a comical degree of wonderment, slaps the flat part and sets it back down. For those of you with time warp wax in your fucking ears, SHE SLAPPED THE CANTEEN! Before you cry pedant, take into account that I love silly garbage like The Mangler, Silent Night Deadly Night 2 and the (as far as utter ridiculousness is concerned) peerless Neon Maniacs. I can take performances ranging from flat to hysterical. I can take wooden and wince inducing scriptwriting. I can even take piss poor practical or visual effects that elicit howls of laughter. What I can't take is a character lazily drifting through a scene stopping to SLAP A FUCKING CANTEEN.

Do you have any idea how shamefully disinterested the Director has to be to even deign to suggest such an action, let alone follow through with filming it? It's the cinematic equivalent to throwing up your hands and exclaiming, "The gas station attendants and their mouth breathing girlfriend's who will come to see this hastily thrown together cash grab aren't going to give a shit about anything other than the fleeting moment of impact we miserly dole out every 26 minutes, so why bother? Sure, look at that hay and smile, swing on that rope despite the action going against your earlier stated recalcitrance and for the love of god and all that is holy, SLAP THAT FUCKING CANTEEN cause that shit is GOLD!

I realize I may be overstating my case a bit here. But the fact remains that the nerd horror message board circles I run in endlessly extol the virtues of films like this based solely on the fact that they have fond childhood memories attached to them. And that's fine. The problem lies in their dogged insistence that things like the Saw series (which in my humble estimation is intricately plotted and a hell of a bloody good time) and the Hostel films are pandering mainstream trash suitable only for "noob" 16 year old kids who shop at Hot Topic. It's shallow and short sighted and insular and just plain wrong to dismiss outright that which is popular and current for the sole reason that it falls into those two categories. Grow up. The wheel wasn't perfected when you were a child. Art is a process and shutting yourself out of that process ultimately restricts both your intellect and your potential enjoyment.

A healthy respect to the forbears is key though. I would never dispute that. I study films from all era's, all genres, all nationalities. Spicing up your screenings with a healthy cross section of all available types of horror films will make your analytical eye sharper, not to mention your knowledge more vast and thusly more unassailable from poser noobs lol jk cm bff rotfl.

But, if you know what you like and you don't need some pompous ass cutting it down and showing you the strings, be my guest. Enjoy your craptastic, callous studio cash-ins from yesteryear with a clean conscience. Just shut the fuck up about the current state of the genre if you're unwilling to approach it with an unbiased eye and an open mind.

Sunday, 7 March 2010

Not nearly crazy enough

I went and saw the remake of Romero's The Crazies today. Having thought the original was a meandering, pointless stop-gap between NOTLD and Dawn of the Dead, I've never been all that jazzed to see this slick update from the son of former Disney chairman Michael Eisner. But, I was in possession of free time and disposable cash and wanted to as Robert Forster put it in Jackie Brown, see something that "started soon and looked good". For the first 40 minutes or so, I thought we might have a minor masterpiece on our hands here. Then, the inevitable hissing sound of the air being let out of the tires as this horror/action vehicle falls flat, having been overburdened by ball-less plot developments and predictable set-pieces slapped together with tired cliche's.

A damn shame considering how stunning the opening is. I've long been fascinated by the preponderance of people in our society who simply snap and walk into a public place with the means and intention to kill as many people possible before being taken out themselves. I can think of few things more terrifying than suddenly being thrust into a life and death situation with the safety of my family, myself and those around me in the hands of a homicidal misanthrope with nothing to live for. Virginia Tech and Columbine and the like get an enormous amount of press initially, but then we as a culture seem to sweep these incidents under the rug and ignore the societal issues that give rise to such despicable and desperate, not to mention potentially avoidable atrocities. This is the true horror of the modern age, these are the gnarled roots of paranoia and distrust of fellow man. This is the nightmare that wakes me up gasping and scanning the room for phantom intruders intent on taking away my life and my family.

So, there is a lot of subtext to chew on there and the first scene of The Crazies establishes the tone and danger impeccably. We see a small town baseball game in progress, the Sheriff and his deputy exchange banter amidst a jovial spring time atmosphere. Suddenly, a disheveled man carrying a shotgun determinedly strolls into center field sending a wave of panic and unease though all in attendance. The sheriff dutifully approaches this man with the intent to disarm him without incident. This of course does not happen and the sheriff is forced to take his life.

Now, unlike most modern genre films, we see the shotgun toting farmers family confront the sheriff in a tense, sad scene and we see the lawman at home struggling with his decision. The death, the murder, has weight. It affects people and means something. If only the film had the audacity to further explore the implications of this brave, horrible new world. Then we would have really had something. Instead it backpedals to a comfort zone of suspense scenarios followed by jump scares followed by the loss of a group member. Wash, rinse, repeat. It's so disheartening cause the film makers were on the right track with plenty of room to maneuver and themes to explore. Characters aren't forced to make decisions and emotionally deal with the consequences of them after this compelling beginning. They're simply required to fight their way out of corners they shouldn't have put themselves in. Romero's beloved Government conspiracy angle is reduced to a lazy afterthought significant only in that it occasions the appearance of soldiers in bad-ass haz-mat suits, black helicopters and the requisite great big explosion at the end.

Don't get me wrong, this is passable entertainment. There is some truly bang-up set pieces, specifically the pitchfork massacre and the jarring car wash sequence. It's stylishly filmed with wonderful acting that elevates every frame, but it could have been so much more. I'm getting to the point where I need more than regret at the missed opportunity to stick with me after the credits roll.